Navigating an Emerging Landscape: The Role of Fraud Risk Assessment in Forensic Work

As professionals in the field of fraud examination and forensic accounting, we understand that the process of detecting and investigating fraud can be both demanding and time-intensive. But what if there were a means to proactively stop fraud before it even begins? This is precisely where the practice of fraud risk assessment becomes essential.

In the first article, we discussed the two branches of forensic accounting and fraud examination, namely preventive and detective practices, and how to start in this emerging domain.

Haven’t read the first article yet? Catch up now! Click here!

Let’s now explore preventive practices in greater detail, which is comparably simpler for beginners to get hold of. In my experience, there are several prospects in this sector for beginners. One such practice is fraud risk assessment, which is a crucial element for a fraud examiner. Through this article, we will explore how fraud risk assessment works and its significance in mitigating the risks of fraud.

Fraud risk assessment (FRA) is a preventive practice that involves identifying and assessing the risks of fraud within an organisation or business. By conducting a fraud risk assessment, we can determine where potential fraud risks lie and take proactive steps to mitigate them. This is a critical step in fraud prevention because it helps us to address issues before they become major problems, saving the organisation time and money.

As a fraud examiner or forensic accountant, you play a vital role in preventing and detecting fraud. By incorporating fraud risk assessment into your arsenal of tools, you can take a proactive approach to fraud prevention and make a significant impact on your organisation’s overall fraud risk management strategy.

---

The Power of Fraud Risk Assessment: A Proactive Approach to Combatting Fraud

As a professional delving into fraud examination, you might have an idea about risk assessment. In the context of fraud prevention, the role of risk assessment is critical.

While risk assessment is a process of identifying and evaluating potential risks and hazards that may affect an organisation, fraud risk assessment (FRA) is a specialised type of risk assessment that specifically focuses on the risks of fraud and financial crime within an organisation.

As the Association of Fraud Examiners (ACFE) describes, fraud risk assessment is a customised and continuous process that helps identify and address an organisation’s vulnerabilities to both internal and external fraud. It is not a one-size-fits-all approach and should be tailored to the specific organisation. The process involves identifying and prioritising fraud risks and evolves over time as results drive education, communication, organisational alignment, and action in effectively managing and identifying new fraud risks. FRA can help organisations achieve their objectives by decreasing the risk of fraud and increasing operational efficiency.

In its 2022 Report to Nations, the ACFE notes that formal fraud risk assessments have seen an increase in implementation rates for anti-fraud policies over the past decade.

The benefits of conducting FRA include: –

Reducing the likelihood of fraud occurring,

Minimising the potential financial impact of fraud on the organisation,

Enhancing the overall effectiveness of the organisation’s control environment, and

Demonstrating a commitment to ethical business practices.

While internal audit focuses on evaluating and improving internal control systems and compliance with policies and regulations, FRA focuses specifically on identifying potential fraud risks and developing strategies to prevent and detect fraud. FRA goes beyond traditional audit procedures and requires specialised knowledge and expertise in forensics and fraud examination.

Practical Application of Fraud Risk Assessment

Fraud risk assessment can be helpful in a variety of practical scenarios for an organisation. Here are some examples:

Frameworks and Tools

There are several fraud risk assessment frameworks available, developed by various organisations. The ACFE provides a comprehensive framework for conducting fraud risk assessments. The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India (ICAI) has also developed a framework for fraud risk assessment, which includes identifying the fraud risk areas and evaluating the control environment. The American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA) also provides a framework for managing fraud risk. Additionally, the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) has developed a framework that includes five components of internal control, including risk assessment. Other frameworks include the ISO 31000:2018 Risk Management Standard and the Fraud Risk Management Guide by the Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants. Each framework has its own unique approach to conducting fraud risk assessments, and organisations can choose the one that best fits their needs and objectives.

Further, several tools and techniques are used in conducting a fraud risk assessment, including data analysis, fraud scenario analysis, and internal control reviews. Data analysis involves reviewing financial and operational data to identify unusual trends and patterns that may indicate potential fraud. Fraud scenario analysis involves developing hypothetical fraud scenarios and assessing the organisation’s vulnerability to each scenario. Internal control reviews involve evaluating the organisation’s existing internal controls to identify gaps and weaknesses that may be exploited by fraudsters.

---

Conducting Fraud Risk Assessment

6 Essential Steps Involved in Conducting a Fraud Risk Assessment:

We have understood that fraud risk assessment is a proactive approach aimed at identifying potential fraud risks and addressing them before they occur. Now, let us see the 6 steps of conducting a fraud risk assessment.

Planning: The first step is to plan the assessment, which involves defining the scope, objectives, and methodology of the assessment. It also includes identifying the resources needed for the assessment.

Information gathering: This step involves collecting information about the organisation’s operations, systems, and processes. This includes conducting interviews, reviewing documentation, and analysing data.

Risk identification: The next step is identifying potential fraud risks. This can be done through a brainstorming session with stakeholders, reviewing historical fraud data, and analysing industry trends.

Risk assessment: Once the risks are identified, they must be assessed to determine their likelihood and potential impact on the organisation. This involves assigning a risk score to each risk based on its likelihood and potential impact.

Risk response: After the risks are assessed, the organisation needs to develop a response plan to address the identified risks. This can include implementing controls to mitigate the risks, transferring the risks to third parties, or accepting the risks.

Monitoring: Finally, the organisation needs to monitor the effectiveness of the risk response plan and periodically reassess the risks to ensure that the organisation remains protected against potential fraud risks.

Now that we have an idea about conducting the fraud risk assessment, it is important to consider a few factors before beginning an assessment in an organisation. The following are some of them: –

9 Factors to Consider Before a Fraud Risk Assessment

In conclusion, implementing a fraud risk assessment framework is a critical component of any effective fraud prevention program. A fraud risk assessment helps organisations identify their vulnerabilities and proactively take measures to prevent fraud.

We now have a fundamental understanding of fraud risk assessment as a tool for fraud prevention and how it can especially benefit organisations. We’ll learn how to create a fraud risk assessment in the coming week by exploring multiple scenarios across industries with the aid of a template.

Watch this space!

The age-old saying, “An ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure”, rings true when it comes to fraud. By proactively identifying and addressing potential fraud risks, organisations can avoid the costly and time-consuming reactive processes of investigations.